Evaluation of the 2020 European Academy of Neurology virtual congress: transition from a face‐to‐face to a virtual meeting

Background and purpose Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, scientific congresses are increasingly being organized as virtual (VCs). In May 2020, European Academy of Neurology (EAN) held a VC, free charge. absence systematic studies on this topic, aim study is evaluate attendance perceived quality 2020 EAN VC compared 2019 face-to-face congress (FFC). Methods An analysis demographic data participants obtained from online registration was done. A comparison two based survey with questions perception speakers’ performance, networking other aspects made. Results Of 43,596 registered participants, 20,694 active attended VC. Compared 2019, number tripled (6916 in 2019) cumulated attending sessions five times higher (169,334 vs. 33,024 2019). Out 55% were outside Europe, 42% board-certified neurologists (FFC 80%) 21% students 0.6%). The content evaluated ‘above expectation’ by 56% attendees 41%). respondents who had been exposed earlier 73% preferred FFC (17%). Conclusion fulfilled main mission organizing high despite restrictions impersonal format. geographical distribution proves expected inclusivity large participation training opens new educational potentials for EAN.